Thursday, January 17, 2008

On How The BBC Got It So Wrong

Earlier this week, apropos of nothing, really, I sat down and watched the 1979 FA Cup Final between Arsenal and Manchester United. It was like a breath of fresh air, and a reminder of how good the BBC used to be at broadcasting football. I've watched their recent coverage, however, with increasing dismay but they managed a new nadir last night with FA Cup coverage that lurched into the realms of farce, leaving the corporation looking like your trendy uncle at a wedding, wearing a medallion and asking the bride's friends if they've seen The Blurs play lately.

More or less anyone with any nous could have told you that Manchester City vs West Ham United game was going to be terrible. Manchester City are the kings of the 1-0 win, and the first match between them at Upton Park last week was an absolute shocker. Yet again, though, the BBC failed to see the wood for the trees, ignored one of the stories of the round (in the form of Conference South Havant & Waterlooville playing Swansea City for the right to a trip to Anfield after the two sides played out a bad tempered first match at the Liberty Stadium) in order to put the names of two Premier League clubs in their Wednesday night schedules. The match kicked off in a half-empty and disinterested City Of Manchester Stadium and, my word, it stank the place out. This feeling that something altogether more interesting was going on elsewhere was further emphasised by the
regular score updates coming from in from Westleigh Park, where reports were coming in that Havant were two up and that Swansea had missed a penalty. Guy Mowbray, the commentator, sighed audibly and almost expressed that he would sooner be anywhere else.

This was kind of forgiveable, considering the BBC's record in just picking the wrong match. What was singularly unforgivable was their decision, at half-time, to ignore what was going on in Hampshire in favour of a brief look at what hadn't happened in Manchester followed by a twelve minute long hagiography of Kevin Keegan and a thinly-veiled job application from Alan Shearer. It was at this point that I switched the television off and put the radio on to listen to the Havant vs Swansea match on BBC Radio Wales, via the awesome power of the internet. I wonder how many other people did the same thing? All you needed was an internet connection, and off you went.

I wasn't disappointed. The second half of the Havant & Waterlooville vs Swansea City match was absolutely pulsating. It was like being there, with an insane Welsh commentator who sounded as if he was more or less on the verge of a heart attack for the whole of the second half. Swansea had shots cleared off the line, hit and post and the bar and, in the end, Havant won by four goals to two to earn (and, by that, I mean earn) a trip to Anfield in the Fourth Round. It was an absolutely magnificent match, and a credit to both teams. Not that you'd have known much about it if you'd kept the television on BBC1 all evening.

As a quick aside, I'll be writing a weekly column about non-league football at the esteemed Pitch Invasion from now on. The first one is already up on there.


Gervillian Swike said...

I've left comments before, but for the first time I have to reveal that I'm from Swansea, I'm a Swansea City fan, and that the frustration I feel that we've missed out on the only decent draw we've had in two decades is immense.

BUT! Your comments are spot on. Havant deserved their victory for the way they went about us last night, and the game was an absolute cracker that anyone with an interest in football would have wanted to see. I was lucky (well probably) enough to get highlights on BBC Wales at 11:20, and it was a cracker. In other words, BBC TV did have a camera and commentary team there, and to hear the usual faces lament about the problems with the disappearing magic of the cup when a corporation that relies upon such magic cannot see its role in promoting it, even out of self-interest if nothing else, is laughable. Never mind, when Chelsea and Man United play out another dreary 1-0aet final in May, it'll all be worthwhile. BBC should take note - as ye sow, so shall ye reap.

sp3ktor said...

The BBC's coverage has been nose-diving for years - their numerous sins culminating in - "Your shout ahhh".

BBC want to be better than sky but have no idea how to go about it.

Sky are just appalingly politically motivated. I watched Andy Gray spout off a couple of weeks ago when two goal-line dispute were called correctly by the linesmen: he said that it was just lucky they spotted them both and that this example should strengthen the argument for video replays. I shit you not.

Interestingly for one of the goals both sky and the BBC used computer models to prove whether the ball had crossed the line - and came up with different results (it was in the reading v sunderland game)

And yes - I do like The Blurs

Sniffer 72 said...

I couldn't agree more, I was apalled when I realised the BBC's choice. Lineker summed it up at the end of the game after they had shown a clip of the team and fans celebrating at H & W. He said "it looks exciting down there. And we had Man City v West Ham" Rueful look into the camera. Oh dear.

Duffman said...

Yep. A craven piece of scheduling from the Beeb Even if they didn't have the courage to show a live game at a non-league ground during prime-time on BBC1, there would have been continuity by showing the Newcastle replay since they showed the first match. The fact that Keegan turned up only doubled the BBC's shame.

In this respect it is a good thing that they are losing the FA Cup. Not that I expect ITV to be any better. In fact...

ally p said...

I too switched to Radio Wales. I live in Cardiff, and it was disappointing that BBC Wales TV didn't cover it. It was always going to be a blood and thunder cup tie.

Design by Dzelque Blogger Templates 2007-2008